Friday, September 18, 2009

Report Suggests Soda Tax Could Curb Obesity and Generate Revenue for States

Caption: A soda tax could generate the needed funds to combat obesity


A recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that a small soda tax could help curb obesity and generate millions of dollars in revenue for cash-strapped states.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided a summary of the report online including a link to the full report:
http://www.rwjf.org/childhoodobesity/digest.jsp?id=22681


Soda Tax Calculator
Very much related, the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity created an online tool that calculates the amount of money states could generate from a soda tax. For example, if Missouri adopted a soda tax of 2 cents per 20-ounce soda, the state would raise over $36 million in 2010 alone. You can access the soda tax calculator here:
http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/sodatax.aspx

Isn't it Ironic?
One of the reasons soda is so darn cheap is because the US government subsidizes the production of corn and therefore, the production of high-fructose corn syrup, which is the second ingredient in soda. In fact, the cost of soda has decreased by over 20% while the price of fresh fruits and vegetables increased by nearly 40%. Now, the government is considering taxing these sugary sodas.

So in essence, the government is paying to make soda cheap and then taxing soda to raise money to solve the problems that soda contributes to, such as rampant obesity and type II diabetes. There's a lesson in unintended consequences somewhere in there...

Monday, September 14, 2009

Big Food vs. Big Insurance

Food Policy = Health Policy


Author Michael Pollan recently wrote an editorial arguing that the proposed health care reform has the potential to trigger major agricultural reform.

It's simple, he suggests: If the big health insurance companies are no longer able to turn away people due to "pre-existing conditions", they will have significantly more motivation to prevent diseases to avoid spending tons of money treating diseases. Since many of the most prevalent diseases, such as heart disease and type II diabetes, result from eating unhealthy foods, the insurance companies will become allies for healthy eating. They will have a new found incentive (saving money), to encourage people to eat healthier foods and to encourage the agricultural sector to produce high-quality, low-cost fresh foods.

It's a compelling editorial written by one of this decade's foremost thinkers on food. Check it out: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/10/opinion/10pollan.html

Friday, September 11, 2009

CDC Community Strategies Guide

Caption: The cover of the CDC's new community obesity strategies guide, released July 2009

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recently released a new resource that we want to share with you. The document outlines a series of obesity prevention strategies that are recommended for communities. Each strategy presented in the document is accompanied with ideas for implementation and measurement.

You can download the document as a pdf directly from the CDC website below:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5807.pdf

Or visit an online (less pretty) version here:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5807a1.htm
www.cdc.gov/mmwR/PDF/rr/rr5807.pdf

A BOLD New Public Health Ad Campaign

Caption: NYC Health Department's blunt new ad campaign


BOLD, right? New York City Health Department just rolled out the "Don't Drink Yourself Fat" ad campaign to encourage people to cut back on soda and other high-calorie drinks.

Accompanying the new bold campaign was a strong statement from NYC's Health Commissioner, Thomas A. Farley: “Sugary drinks shouldn’t be a part of our everyday diet. Drinking beverages loaded with sugars increases the risk of obesity and associated problems, particularly diabetes but also heart disease, stroke, arthritis and cancer.”

To learn more about the campaign, visit:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2009/pr057-09.shtml

To read an editorial discussing the likely impact of this campaign or a soda tax to change behaviors, visit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/14/opinion/14mon3.html?th&emc=th

A year and a half ago we wrote a post titled We Let Kids Drink This Stuff?! about the impacts of soda on school children. The post links to a compelling description of what soda actually does to our bodies when we drink it. Check it out.

Finally, here is another graphic from NYC's new ad campaign:

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Re-Envisioning the Corner Store

Photo Credit: Dawn Majors from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch


For decades corner stores served as the cornerstones of community life in American cities. They sold needed goods to local residents, served as important social hubs, and added an element of vibrancy to local streetscapes.

In the last several decades, the corner store has become something different altogether. In many urban neighborhoods, suburban towns, and rural main streets, corner stores now corner the market of junk foods, lottery tickets, booze, and cigarettes. Where corner stores used to provide local residents with access to important life necessities, they now only provide for our vices.

A New Vision
Two intrepid St. Louisans have taken to re-envisioning the corner store as a community asset, instead of a detriment to public health and safety. Shawn Mckie and Angie Beatty launched The Juice Box corner store, selling healthy foods and hosting community events. Shawn and Angie wanted to not only get back to the roots of the corner store as a community hub, but also address a pressing community need -- providing much needed access to healthy foods. The Juice Box is located in St. Louis City at 3003 Arsenal Street, in a community where junk food options significantly outnumber healthy options, which is the situation in most American communities. With adult and childhood obesity rates at an all time high, The Juice Box is an important and innovative step towards the creation of Healthy, Active & Vibrant Communities.

Shawn and Angie were recently selected as Echoing Green Fellows for their social entrepreneurial work with the Juice Box.

To learn more about the award-winning Juice Box and it's founders, Shawn and Angie, check out this great article:
http://tinyurl.com/juiceboxcornerstore

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Who Defines "Healthy Food"?

Caption: Welcome to every supermarket in America. You are looking at aisles of food seen from above.... OR are you really looking at aisles of expensive marketing and mis-information?

The New York Times just printed an article about a new "Smart Choices" labeling program that is being adopted by many major food companies, including Kellogg's, Kraft Foods, General Mills, Unilever, and Tyson Foods. The "Smart Choices" label is prominently displayed on the front of food items to indicate healthier choices. This new labeling effort is being driven by the food industry and invokes the question:

Who gets to define "healthy food" or "smart choices"?

"The Smart Choices Program was motivated by the need for a single, trusted and reliable front-of-pack nutrition labeling program that U.S. food manufacturers and retailers could voluntarily adopt to help guide consumers in making smarter food and beverage choices." --Smart Choices Program Website

Caption: One version of the new "Smart Choices Program" product label


According to the Smart Choices Program, Froot Loops, is a "Smart Choice," yet the first ingredient is sugar and Froot Loops contains no fruit, contrary to what the name seems to imply.

Author and Professor Michael Pollan has written extensively about healthy foods in his books The Omnivore's Dilemma and In Defense of Food. Pollan's motto for eating is simple:

Eat Food. Mostly Plants. Not Too Much.

In his article Unhappy Meals, Pollan extrapolated on this motto with a set of recommendations for how we should approach food. We have abbreviated and condensed his recommendations below for your reading pleasure:

1. Eat food. Don’t eat anything your great-great-grandmother wouldn’t recognize as food. There are a great many foodlike items in the supermarket your ancestors wouldn’t recognize as food (Go-Gurt? Breakfast-cereal bars? Nondairy creamer?); stay away from these.

2. Avoid even those food products that come bearing health claims. They’re apt to be heavily processed, and the claims are often dubious at best. When Kellogg’s can boast about its Healthy Heart Strawberry Vanilla cereal bars, health claims have become hopelessly compromised. Don’t take the silence of the yams as a sign that they have nothing valuable to say about health.

3. Especially avoid food products containing ingredients that are a) unfamiliar, b) unpronounceable c) more than five in number — or that contain high-fructose corn syrup.

4. Get out of the supermarket whenever possible. You won’t find any high-fructose corn syrup at the farmer’s market; you also won’t find food harvested long ago and far away. What you will find are fresh whole foods picked at the peak of nutritional quality. Precisely the kind of food your great-great-grandmother would have recognized as food.

5. Pay more, eat less. The American food system has for a century devoted its energies and policies to increasing quantity and reducing price, not to improving quality. There’s no escaping the fact that better food costs more, because it has been grown or raised less intensively and with more care. Not everyone can afford to eat well in America, which is shameful, but most of us can: Americans spend, on average, less than 10 percent of their income on food, down from 24 percent in 1947, and less than the citizens of any other nation. And those of us who can afford to eat well should.

“Eat less” is the most unwelcome advice of all, but in fact the scientific case for eating a lot less than we currently do is compelling. To make the “eat less” message a bit more palatable, consider that quality may have a bearing on quantity: I don’t know about you, but the better the quality of the food I eat, the less of it I need to feel satisfied. All tomatoes are not created equal.

6. Eat mostly plants, especially leaves. ...by eating a plant-based diet, you’ll be consuming far fewer calories, since plant foods (except seeds) are typically less “energy dense” than the other things you might eat. Vegetarians are healthier than carnivores, but near vegetarians (“flexitarians”) are as healthy as vegetarians.

7. Eat more like the French. Or the Japanese. Or the Italians. Or the Greeks. Confounding factors aside, people who eat according to the rules of a traditional food culture are generally healthier than we are. Any traditional diet will do: if it weren’t a healthy diet, the people who follow it wouldn’t still be around. Let culture be your guide, not science.

8. Cook. And if you can, plant a garden. To take part in the intricate and endlessly interesting processes of providing for our sustenance is the surest way to escape the culture of fast food and the values implicit in it: that food should be cheap and easy; that food is fuel and not communion.

9. Eat like an omnivore. Try to add new species, not just new foods, to your diet. The greater the diversity of species you eat, the more likely you are to cover all your nutritional bases.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

What's Your Community's Score for Walkability?

Caption: Walk!


Q: How often do you walk to the store or to work?
A: The chances are good that your answer to this question is directly connected to how walkable your community is.

Q: So how walkable IS your community?
A: The website Walk Score has the answer:
http://www.walkscore.com/

Q:
What makes a neighborhood walkable?
A: The following are the criteria Walk Score uses to rate your neighborhood:

  • A center: Walkable neighborhoods have a discernable center, whether it's a shopping district, a main street, or a public space.
  • Density: The neighborhood is compact enough for local businesses to flourish and for public transportation to run frequently.
  • Mixed income, mixed use: Housing is provided for everyone who works in the neighborhood: young and old, singles and families, rich and poor. Businesses and residences are located near each other.
  • Parks and public space: There are plenty of public places to gather and play.
  • Pedestrian-centric design: Buildings are placed close to the street to cater to foot traffic, with parking lots relegated to the back.
  • Nearby schools and workplaces: Schools and workplaces are close enough that most residents can walk from their homes.
Q: Is it accurate?
A: There are many important factors that Walk Score does not take into account. Here are just a few that the Walk Score website is aware it has not included in its fancy algorithm:
  • Public transit: Good public transit is important for walkable neighborhoods.
  • Street width and block length: Narrow streets slow down traffic. Short blocks provide more routes to the same destination and make it easier to take a direct route.
  • Street design: Sidewalks and safe crossings are essential to walkability. Appropriate automobile speeds, trees, and other features also help.
  • Safety from crime and crashes: How much crime is in the neighborhood? How many traffic accidents are there? Are streets well-lit?
  • Pedestrian-friendly community design: Are buildings close to the sidewalk with parking in back? Are destinations clustered together?
  • Topography: Hills can make walking difficult, especially if you're carrying groceries.
  • Freeways and bodies of water: Freeways can divide neighborhoods. Swimming is harder than walking.
  • Weather: In some places it's just too hot or cold to walk regularly.
The Walk Scores website is a fun and interesting tool that gets folks thinking about all the factors that go into making a place walkable. However, take the results with a grain of salt. Afterall, Walk Score isn't sophisticated enough to discern a store that sells books for all ages from an "adult book store".

Friday, September 4, 2009

Crank and Click 2 September 19!


Be sure to join Trailnet for . . . 

CRANK and CLICK 2!
September 19 | Atomic Cowboy – 4140 Manchester Ave, St. Louis
5PM

Have fun doing a photo-scavenger hunt on your bike and support Trailnet’s Livable St. Louis at the same time! Be the team to get the most photos of your bikes in various settings around the city and win a prize! Teams for Crank and Click 2 are limited to two people; the cost is $10 per team. Kids and adults welcome. Bring your bike and your digital camera!

Crank and Click 2 is presented by Will Cycle for Charity, a not for profit group of St.Louis Area cyclists who donate their skills and time to raise money for local charity organizations through cycling events. Visit http://www.willcycleforcharity.com for more information.

Livable St. Louis September 23!


Think of your favorite places to walk and bike.  Chances are they are places where you feel safe and comfortable.  They probably are even places with beauty and energetic street life.  

Vibrant streets and communities play an important role in supporting healthy and active lifestyles.  While providing us access to the goods and services we need in an enjoyable environment, they also often encourage biking, walking, and other physical activity.

Trailnet is continuing the conversation about how we foster vibrant communities through Livable St. Louis: What it Takes to Retain and Attract Creative Individuals.  Join Trailnet, Next American City, and local partners for a discussion about retaining creative individuals in St. Louis. As St. Louis transforms into a more vibrant city, how can it maintain a creative population with talents and energy to contribute to the larger community?

Livable St. Louis: What it Takes to Retain and Attract Creative Individuals
September 23 | Left Bank Books - 312 N. 10th St. at Locust
7-9 pm

RSVP Today! americancity.org/urbanexus/st.louis