Thursday, November 19, 2009

Good News for Bike/Ped Funding

Caption: The street shown above include bike lanes, sidewalk, and pedestrian curb cuts, all of which are supported by the proposed policy statement


The Obama administration just took another step to support funding for pedestrian and bicycle accommodations that support public transportation. If you haven’t heard the news, this could make significantly more funding available for non-motorized infrastructure projects in the next few years. Since good news is meant to be shared, please pass this onwards. See below for info sent out by the National Complete Streets Coalition:

The Obama Administration isn't letting the delay in transportation reauthorization prevent them from doing more to encourage walking, biking, and taking public transportation. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) just issued a "Proposed Policy Statement on the Eligibility of Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements under Federal Transit Law." The statement makes the case for investing in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure around transit stops and stations in order to increase ridership and improve livability. Importantly, it clarifies the use of transit funds for these types of projects: the new policy would make all pedestrian improvements with 1/2 mile and all bicycle improvements within 3 miles of a stop or station eligible for funds from several transit programs. In explaining support for these types of projects, FTA quoted Secretary LaHood's summer testimony that mentioned complete streets.

Federal Highway Administration has also posted program guidance on their website to clarify that Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program funds can be used for bicycle and pedestrian projects and programs. The League of American Bicyclists discusses how CMAQ funds can be used for bicycle and pedestrian projects in your community in a timely new report.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

It's time to BAN texting-while-driving

Caption: Screeeeeetch! Boom!

You have probably heard many stories about the dangers of texting-while-driving. Perhaps you have even seen the gruesome videos that show mangled cars and worse. As an organization that promotes walking and biking, we at Trailnet are acutely aware of the dangers of this new American past-time because our constituents do not travel in reinforced steel boxes. Instead, our constituents travel au naturale, on foot, on bike, and in wheelchairs.

A recent AP article tells of a New Jersey cyclist that was struck by a driver who was too busy texting about a drug deal to notice the cyclist's bright reflective vest. Read it for yourself:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091118/ap_on_re_us/us_texting_crash_drug_charges

Also, Transportation for American recently released the report Dangerous By Design that chronicles the thousands of annual pedestrian deaths caused by poorly designed roadways. This is yet another reason why every city, metro area, and state needs to adopt a Complete Streets policy. Check out the report below:
http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/

Poorly designed streets + drivers not paying attention = a caustic environment for the ~30% of American adults who don't drive...not to mention the 100% of children who don't drive

If you agree that it's time to make texting-while-driving illegal, we encourage you to contact your local and state elected officials with your concerns.

Yours in solidarity for common sense,
-Trailnet

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Livable Streets Network

Caption: The Livable Streets Initiative Website


The Livable Streets Initiative is an incredible resource for anyone and everyone interested in transforming their community. The initiative website includes a library of films that are profoundly educational and inspiring, a series of blogs from major American cities, and a community forum.

As you'll see, the Livable Streets Initiative is a living dialogue about how to create better communities for people, health, and the environment. It is a great place to learn, to explore, and to connect with people, projects, and ideas around the world.

Check it all out at:
http://www.livablestreets.com/

To wet your appetite, check out the following video below:

Friday, October 2, 2009

URBANEXUS provides lively discussion on retaining and attracting creative individuals in St. Louis


What does "creative-type" mean? Does categorizing individuals as "creatives" do more harm than good as we try to promote creativity?  What can we do to foster creativity and move things forward in St. Louis' creative world?

These were just a few of the questions that led to provocative conversation at the September 23 URBANEXUS discussion "Livable St. Louis: What it Takes to Retain and Attract Creative Individuals."  The discussion was part of Next American City's national URBANEXUS salon series and was co-hosted by Trailnet and local partners Great Rivers Greenway, STL-Style, Urban Land Institute, Metropolis St. Louis, and Will Cycle for Charity. 

One-hundred people attended the event at Left Bank Books' downtown discussion to hear local panelists share their views on the role of creativity  and the people who create in St. Louis. Panelists included Jasmin Aber, adjunct professor at Washington University’s Sam Fox School of Design & Visual Arts and shrinking cities researcher; Alderman Antonio French; Leslie Proud, Vice President of Metropolis St. Louis; Galen Gondolfi, non-profit community development practitioner who supports community-based reinvestment on Cherokee Street; and myself who provided perspective on the role of bikeable and walkable communities.  

Trailnet invited Next American City to bring URBANEXUS to St. Louis because we knew that such a discussion could inject vital energy into the community of St. Louisans who are working hard to make St. Louis more livable.  We are happy to report that this is exactly what happened.  We had great attendance, the crowd was up for an extended Q&A session, and people continue to talk about ways to have similar discussions in the future.

The energy from URBANEXUS should not be squandered, but built upon.  One way we are hopeful the discussions can continue is through the regional collaboration Livable St. Louis, initiated through a partnership between Trailnet and St. Louis University. The collaborative will bring people together from a variety of sectors and fields to share and implement best-practices for built environment and policy change as a strategy for fostering active lifestyles and healthy eating. Livable St. Louis is slated to launch in early 2010.


Jennifer Allen

Friday, September 18, 2009

Report Suggests Soda Tax Could Curb Obesity and Generate Revenue for States

Caption: A soda tax could generate the needed funds to combat obesity


A recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that a small soda tax could help curb obesity and generate millions of dollars in revenue for cash-strapped states.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided a summary of the report online including a link to the full report:
http://www.rwjf.org/childhoodobesity/digest.jsp?id=22681


Soda Tax Calculator
Very much related, the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity created an online tool that calculates the amount of money states could generate from a soda tax. For example, if Missouri adopted a soda tax of 2 cents per 20-ounce soda, the state would raise over $36 million in 2010 alone. You can access the soda tax calculator here:
http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/sodatax.aspx

Isn't it Ironic?
One of the reasons soda is so darn cheap is because the US government subsidizes the production of corn and therefore, the production of high-fructose corn syrup, which is the second ingredient in soda. In fact, the cost of soda has decreased by over 20% while the price of fresh fruits and vegetables increased by nearly 40%. Now, the government is considering taxing these sugary sodas.

So in essence, the government is paying to make soda cheap and then taxing soda to raise money to solve the problems that soda contributes to, such as rampant obesity and type II diabetes. There's a lesson in unintended consequences somewhere in there...

Monday, September 14, 2009

Big Food vs. Big Insurance

Food Policy = Health Policy


Author Michael Pollan recently wrote an editorial arguing that the proposed health care reform has the potential to trigger major agricultural reform.

It's simple, he suggests: If the big health insurance companies are no longer able to turn away people due to "pre-existing conditions", they will have significantly more motivation to prevent diseases to avoid spending tons of money treating diseases. Since many of the most prevalent diseases, such as heart disease and type II diabetes, result from eating unhealthy foods, the insurance companies will become allies for healthy eating. They will have a new found incentive (saving money), to encourage people to eat healthier foods and to encourage the agricultural sector to produce high-quality, low-cost fresh foods.

It's a compelling editorial written by one of this decade's foremost thinkers on food. Check it out: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/10/opinion/10pollan.html

Friday, September 11, 2009

CDC Community Strategies Guide

Caption: The cover of the CDC's new community obesity strategies guide, released July 2009

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recently released a new resource that we want to share with you. The document outlines a series of obesity prevention strategies that are recommended for communities. Each strategy presented in the document is accompanied with ideas for implementation and measurement.

You can download the document as a pdf directly from the CDC website below:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5807.pdf

Or visit an online (less pretty) version here:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5807a1.htm
www.cdc.gov/mmwR/PDF/rr/rr5807.pdf

A BOLD New Public Health Ad Campaign

Caption: NYC Health Department's blunt new ad campaign


BOLD, right? New York City Health Department just rolled out the "Don't Drink Yourself Fat" ad campaign to encourage people to cut back on soda and other high-calorie drinks.

Accompanying the new bold campaign was a strong statement from NYC's Health Commissioner, Thomas A. Farley: “Sugary drinks shouldn’t be a part of our everyday diet. Drinking beverages loaded with sugars increases the risk of obesity and associated problems, particularly diabetes but also heart disease, stroke, arthritis and cancer.”

To learn more about the campaign, visit:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2009/pr057-09.shtml

To read an editorial discussing the likely impact of this campaign or a soda tax to change behaviors, visit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/14/opinion/14mon3.html?th&emc=th

A year and a half ago we wrote a post titled We Let Kids Drink This Stuff?! about the impacts of soda on school children. The post links to a compelling description of what soda actually does to our bodies when we drink it. Check it out.

Finally, here is another graphic from NYC's new ad campaign:

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Re-Envisioning the Corner Store

Photo Credit: Dawn Majors from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch


For decades corner stores served as the cornerstones of community life in American cities. They sold needed goods to local residents, served as important social hubs, and added an element of vibrancy to local streetscapes.

In the last several decades, the corner store has become something different altogether. In many urban neighborhoods, suburban towns, and rural main streets, corner stores now corner the market of junk foods, lottery tickets, booze, and cigarettes. Where corner stores used to provide local residents with access to important life necessities, they now only provide for our vices.

A New Vision
Two intrepid St. Louisans have taken to re-envisioning the corner store as a community asset, instead of a detriment to public health and safety. Shawn Mckie and Angie Beatty launched The Juice Box corner store, selling healthy foods and hosting community events. Shawn and Angie wanted to not only get back to the roots of the corner store as a community hub, but also address a pressing community need -- providing much needed access to healthy foods. The Juice Box is located in St. Louis City at 3003 Arsenal Street, in a community where junk food options significantly outnumber healthy options, which is the situation in most American communities. With adult and childhood obesity rates at an all time high, The Juice Box is an important and innovative step towards the creation of Healthy, Active & Vibrant Communities.

Shawn and Angie were recently selected as Echoing Green Fellows for their social entrepreneurial work with the Juice Box.

To learn more about the award-winning Juice Box and it's founders, Shawn and Angie, check out this great article:
http://tinyurl.com/juiceboxcornerstore

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Who Defines "Healthy Food"?

Caption: Welcome to every supermarket in America. You are looking at aisles of food seen from above.... OR are you really looking at aisles of expensive marketing and mis-information?

The New York Times just printed an article about a new "Smart Choices" labeling program that is being adopted by many major food companies, including Kellogg's, Kraft Foods, General Mills, Unilever, and Tyson Foods. The "Smart Choices" label is prominently displayed on the front of food items to indicate healthier choices. This new labeling effort is being driven by the food industry and invokes the question:

Who gets to define "healthy food" or "smart choices"?

"The Smart Choices Program was motivated by the need for a single, trusted and reliable front-of-pack nutrition labeling program that U.S. food manufacturers and retailers could voluntarily adopt to help guide consumers in making smarter food and beverage choices." --Smart Choices Program Website

Caption: One version of the new "Smart Choices Program" product label


According to the Smart Choices Program, Froot Loops, is a "Smart Choice," yet the first ingredient is sugar and Froot Loops contains no fruit, contrary to what the name seems to imply.

Author and Professor Michael Pollan has written extensively about healthy foods in his books The Omnivore's Dilemma and In Defense of Food. Pollan's motto for eating is simple:

Eat Food. Mostly Plants. Not Too Much.

In his article Unhappy Meals, Pollan extrapolated on this motto with a set of recommendations for how we should approach food. We have abbreviated and condensed his recommendations below for your reading pleasure:

1. Eat food. Don’t eat anything your great-great-grandmother wouldn’t recognize as food. There are a great many foodlike items in the supermarket your ancestors wouldn’t recognize as food (Go-Gurt? Breakfast-cereal bars? Nondairy creamer?); stay away from these.

2. Avoid even those food products that come bearing health claims. They’re apt to be heavily processed, and the claims are often dubious at best. When Kellogg’s can boast about its Healthy Heart Strawberry Vanilla cereal bars, health claims have become hopelessly compromised. Don’t take the silence of the yams as a sign that they have nothing valuable to say about health.

3. Especially avoid food products containing ingredients that are a) unfamiliar, b) unpronounceable c) more than five in number — or that contain high-fructose corn syrup.

4. Get out of the supermarket whenever possible. You won’t find any high-fructose corn syrup at the farmer’s market; you also won’t find food harvested long ago and far away. What you will find are fresh whole foods picked at the peak of nutritional quality. Precisely the kind of food your great-great-grandmother would have recognized as food.

5. Pay more, eat less. The American food system has for a century devoted its energies and policies to increasing quantity and reducing price, not to improving quality. There’s no escaping the fact that better food costs more, because it has been grown or raised less intensively and with more care. Not everyone can afford to eat well in America, which is shameful, but most of us can: Americans spend, on average, less than 10 percent of their income on food, down from 24 percent in 1947, and less than the citizens of any other nation. And those of us who can afford to eat well should.

“Eat less” is the most unwelcome advice of all, but in fact the scientific case for eating a lot less than we currently do is compelling. To make the “eat less” message a bit more palatable, consider that quality may have a bearing on quantity: I don’t know about you, but the better the quality of the food I eat, the less of it I need to feel satisfied. All tomatoes are not created equal.

6. Eat mostly plants, especially leaves. ...by eating a plant-based diet, you’ll be consuming far fewer calories, since plant foods (except seeds) are typically less “energy dense” than the other things you might eat. Vegetarians are healthier than carnivores, but near vegetarians (“flexitarians”) are as healthy as vegetarians.

7. Eat more like the French. Or the Japanese. Or the Italians. Or the Greeks. Confounding factors aside, people who eat according to the rules of a traditional food culture are generally healthier than we are. Any traditional diet will do: if it weren’t a healthy diet, the people who follow it wouldn’t still be around. Let culture be your guide, not science.

8. Cook. And if you can, plant a garden. To take part in the intricate and endlessly interesting processes of providing for our sustenance is the surest way to escape the culture of fast food and the values implicit in it: that food should be cheap and easy; that food is fuel and not communion.

9. Eat like an omnivore. Try to add new species, not just new foods, to your diet. The greater the diversity of species you eat, the more likely you are to cover all your nutritional bases.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

What's Your Community's Score for Walkability?

Caption: Walk!


Q: How often do you walk to the store or to work?
A: The chances are good that your answer to this question is directly connected to how walkable your community is.

Q: So how walkable IS your community?
A: The website Walk Score has the answer:
http://www.walkscore.com/

Q:
What makes a neighborhood walkable?
A: The following are the criteria Walk Score uses to rate your neighborhood:

  • A center: Walkable neighborhoods have a discernable center, whether it's a shopping district, a main street, or a public space.
  • Density: The neighborhood is compact enough for local businesses to flourish and for public transportation to run frequently.
  • Mixed income, mixed use: Housing is provided for everyone who works in the neighborhood: young and old, singles and families, rich and poor. Businesses and residences are located near each other.
  • Parks and public space: There are plenty of public places to gather and play.
  • Pedestrian-centric design: Buildings are placed close to the street to cater to foot traffic, with parking lots relegated to the back.
  • Nearby schools and workplaces: Schools and workplaces are close enough that most residents can walk from their homes.
Q: Is it accurate?
A: There are many important factors that Walk Score does not take into account. Here are just a few that the Walk Score website is aware it has not included in its fancy algorithm:
  • Public transit: Good public transit is important for walkable neighborhoods.
  • Street width and block length: Narrow streets slow down traffic. Short blocks provide more routes to the same destination and make it easier to take a direct route.
  • Street design: Sidewalks and safe crossings are essential to walkability. Appropriate automobile speeds, trees, and other features also help.
  • Safety from crime and crashes: How much crime is in the neighborhood? How many traffic accidents are there? Are streets well-lit?
  • Pedestrian-friendly community design: Are buildings close to the sidewalk with parking in back? Are destinations clustered together?
  • Topography: Hills can make walking difficult, especially if you're carrying groceries.
  • Freeways and bodies of water: Freeways can divide neighborhoods. Swimming is harder than walking.
  • Weather: In some places it's just too hot or cold to walk regularly.
The Walk Scores website is a fun and interesting tool that gets folks thinking about all the factors that go into making a place walkable. However, take the results with a grain of salt. Afterall, Walk Score isn't sophisticated enough to discern a store that sells books for all ages from an "adult book store".

Friday, September 4, 2009

Crank and Click 2 September 19!


Be sure to join Trailnet for . . . 

CRANK and CLICK 2!
September 19 | Atomic Cowboy – 4140 Manchester Ave, St. Louis
5PM

Have fun doing a photo-scavenger hunt on your bike and support Trailnet’s Livable St. Louis at the same time! Be the team to get the most photos of your bikes in various settings around the city and win a prize! Teams for Crank and Click 2 are limited to two people; the cost is $10 per team. Kids and adults welcome. Bring your bike and your digital camera!

Crank and Click 2 is presented by Will Cycle for Charity, a not for profit group of St.Louis Area cyclists who donate their skills and time to raise money for local charity organizations through cycling events. Visit http://www.willcycleforcharity.com for more information.

Livable St. Louis September 23!


Think of your favorite places to walk and bike.  Chances are they are places where you feel safe and comfortable.  They probably are even places with beauty and energetic street life.  

Vibrant streets and communities play an important role in supporting healthy and active lifestyles.  While providing us access to the goods and services we need in an enjoyable environment, they also often encourage biking, walking, and other physical activity.

Trailnet is continuing the conversation about how we foster vibrant communities through Livable St. Louis: What it Takes to Retain and Attract Creative Individuals.  Join Trailnet, Next American City, and local partners for a discussion about retaining creative individuals in St. Louis. As St. Louis transforms into a more vibrant city, how can it maintain a creative population with talents and energy to contribute to the larger community?

Livable St. Louis: What it Takes to Retain and Attract Creative Individuals
September 23 | Left Bank Books - 312 N. 10th St. at Locust
7-9 pm

RSVP Today! americancity.org/urbanexus/st.louis


  




Monday, August 24, 2009

First Sunday Parkways Event Comes to St. Louis!



Yesterday Trailnet and Live Well Ferguson!  held the first Sunday Parkways event in the St. Louis area! Since the 1970s, cities in Latin America have been closing down streets to car traffic to provide a safe and fun environment for physical activity. In recent years the concept has become popular in the United States and Live Well Ferguson! decided to bring the concept to Ferguson for the first time.

Ferguson Sunday Parkways closes a .9 mile loop of neighborhood streets to car traffic to allow people to walk, bike, rollerblade, and do a host of other physical activities care-free.   Activities such as face-painting, aerobics classes, and hula-hooping are also stationed throughout Lang-Royce Park along the route.  

At yesterday's first Sunday Parkways, over 300 people were physically active and had fun!  We hope you will join us at the next Ferguson Sunday Parkways on September 27 and October 18, 2009 from 1-4 pm.




Monday, August 17, 2009

The Transportation RX

Caption: The document cover

“For too long now, our transportation decision-making has failed to address the impacts that our infrastructure network has on public health and equity. The asphalt poured and lane miles constructed enhanced our mobility and strengthened our economic growth; but too often, this auto-centric mindset took hold and crowded out opportunities to invest in a truly sustainable inter-modal transportation system, in particular a system that meets the needs of underserved communities.”
-
Representative Jim Oberstar
Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee


Transportation is the lifeblood of communities. It connects us to local businesses, our neighbors, jobs, grocery stores, hospitals and other essential goods and services. Well designed transportation systems allow people a number of options for travel from place to place. When we leave our homes each day we should have the ability to choose whether we will walk, bike, take public transit, or drive.

PolicyLink and Prevention Institute recently published a report titled "The Transportation Prescription: Bold New Ideas for Healthy, Equitable Transportation Reform in America" that draws on the latest research on the connections among transportation, health, and equity to present a new vision for transportation development in the 21st century. The report was commissioned by the Healthy Eating Active Living Convergence Partnership, a collaboration of major funders who have come together with the shared goal of changing policies and environments to better achieve the vision of healthy people living in healthy places.

This report shows how equitable transportation policies and investments can improve public health, expand economic opportunity, protect environmental quality and strengthen all communities.

The report draws on research from a forthcoming book, Healthy, Equitable Transportation Policy: Recommendations and Research, authored by academics and advocates from across the nation. A preview draft of the book is now available online. The final book will be available early August on this website.

With the authorization of the federal transportation bill on the horizon, it arrives at a critical time for bringing the transportation sector into discussions of public health and wellness. The report emphasizes the value of working across fields to identify effective and long-term solutions to multiple problems for community health, infrastructure, equity, and the economy.

The report was co-authored by the University of Missouri St. Louis's very own Todd Swanstrom. Well done, Todd!

Download the document here:
http://tinyurl.com/TransportationRx

And check out the HEAL Convergence Partnership here:
http://www.convergencepartnership.org/